![]() 08/07/2015 at 12:50 • Filed to: Local Motors, Strati, Popular Mechanics | ![]() | ![]() |
Popular Mechanics’ piece on Local Motors’ 3D-printed carbon fiber Strati posits the roadster as the simple, inexpensive future of mass-produced transportation. While I would tend to agree that cars are more complex and expensive than may be absolutely necessary, a close look at the Strati shows a golf cart/go cart level of crudeness that would never be acceptable in a first world country except as an off-road toy.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
One application PM mentions that seems more likely is selling the Strati in developing nations. But the cost of the car is quoted at $5000, which, unless I’m wrong, is approaching Tata Nano prices for something smaller and less capable than the Nano.
While the Strati is an awesome concept and seems likely to lead to advancements in the use of 3D printing for manufacturing, it seems a little further from production-ready than PM wants us to believe. Am I wrong to be skeptical?
Photos from !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
![]() 08/07/2015 at 12:56 |
|
I think it’s really cool, but I’d also like to see how it holds up in a crash
![]() 08/07/2015 at 13:03 |
|
You ever seen Legos come apart?
![]() 08/07/2015 at 13:13 |
|
What I’ve seen of crashed CF cars is that they simply disintegrate. I’d expect the same from this, but it doesn’t look like is has crumple-zone equivalents built in.
That’s mostly what I’m getting at here, though. This seems more like a registered-as-a-motorcycle toy to maybe tool around a small, semi-rural town in than any sort of replacement for a proper car.
![]() 08/07/2015 at 13:14 |
|
No you’re not wrong. While I’m 100% for 3D printing, it isn’t the be-all-end-all they’re portraying it as. It’s a new manufacturing method that enables newer more creative designs than with any other, but it has its limitations. One line that irked me was the comparison to the carbon tub of the McLaren. A tub like the McLaren or any supercar or race car uses woven carbon fiber prepreg. The strength and durability of what they use for 3D printing (which is probably chopped CF in resin) is orders of magnitude weaker.
The real exciting and innovative side of 3D printing is the metal stuff. DMLS (deposited metal laser sintering) They’re getting material properties on par with traditional casting methods. That my friend, is exciting stuff
![]() 08/07/2015 at 13:18 |
|
I wonder how long sanding all of that would take. Would look better smooth and with a coat of paint, but obviously that’d be an endeavor.
![]() 08/07/2015 at 13:22 |
|
“We milled the sides to show how that would look,” Rogers says. “Some of the other parts are just how they came out of the printer, so you can see that. But we can make it look however we want. You could put a vinyl wrap on it and the car would still be completely recyclable.”
It’s mentioned in passing, but we don’t get any details on the process involved in milling the CF body. They also failed to include any closeups of the milled side, but from the closeup of the lights, it appears even the milled surfaces leave something to be desired.
![]() 08/07/2015 at 13:26 |
|
It does look like it’s not entirely there...did they print it out of Dark Matter? The dude looks like he’s driving a special effect.
Things will get real interesting once 3D metal printing costs come down. That’s not going to be for a while though (20-50 years)
![]() 08/07/2015 at 13:48 |
|
I completely forgot I actually saw a piece they painted at the auto show. Those milled areas still aren’t smooth enough for paint, but its doable obviously.
ipotato
![]() 08/07/2015 at 14:13 |
|
More likely I expect the first major step of using mass 3D printing in the auto industry will be replacement parts for specific applications that generally have hard to find parts, think classics and enthusiast niche cars. Then it will likely extend into actual production of individual parts.
I don’t think we will see major sales of 3D printed cars for a very long time, but more likely never.
![]() 08/07/2015 at 14:52 |
|
This thing would be a nightmare to clean.
![]() 08/07/2015 at 16:11 |
|
for something smaller and less capable than the Nano.
Huh? I guess it has 2 extra seats, but it’s not really any bigger/more capable. Also, you mention carbon fiber, where do you get that from? I’m pretty sure it’s ABS or some other type of plastic, I don’t think carbon fiber is printable.
![]() 08/07/2015 at 16:41 |
|
The Strati is printed from carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic, a versatile, strong, and relatively cheap material that could enable some new approaches to safety.
The tech to 3D-print CFRP has been around for at least a year.
The Nano has:
An enclosed passenger compartment
Some cargo capacity
Third world-appropriate ride height
Real windows
Among other things.
![]() 08/07/2015 at 21:15 |
|
golf cart?
![]() 08/07/2015 at 23:01 |
|
the Strati shows a golf cart/go cart level of crudeness
![]() 08/09/2015 at 20:18 |
|
Why buy an Miata when a Mirage is both cheaper and more capable?
![]() 08/10/2015 at 03:17 |
|
To answer your question with a hypothetical situation that is relevant to what Popular Mechanics offered as the most promising use of this technology: Because I’m a father of three children living in a developing country where I can just barely afford one vehicle with which to commute to a job that allows me to put food on my family’s table with some regularity. Buying the Nano/Mirage over the Strati/Miata means I can take my family places and maybe still afford to put my kids in school.
I’m not against fun over practicality (my first car was a two-seater with negligible cargo room and I currently DD a coupe), but in the application PM presents, fun vs. practicality is a moot point.